Dendroboard - View Single Post - Legal blue galacts?
Dendroboard

Go Back   Dendroboard
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read Advertise


Support Our Sponsors
No Threads to Display.

facebook

View Single Post
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 06-30-2020, 02:00 AM
Tinc Tank's Avatar
Tinc Tank Tinc Tank is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Ohio, US
Posts: 51
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Default Re: Legal blue galacts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Socratic Monologue View Post
If the captive-bred animals are "the offspring thereof" ('thereof' = 'from that cause or origin', i.e. 'from those original animals', 'from that wildlife') smuggled animals, then those offspring are not legal.

From Lacey, inserting 'the offspring thereof' clause from the listed definition of 'wildlife' in for clarity:

It is unlawful for any person -
(1) to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife or offspring from that wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law;
(2) to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase in interstate or foreign commerce -
(A) any fish or wildlife or offspring from that wildlife taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law or regulation of any State or in violation of any foreign law;

I just don't think you're reading the 'offspring' clause the way it -- judging from the rest of the text -- is intended.
That seems like a bit of a stretch to me. I read it as two separate things individually "any fish or wildlife taken, possessed, transported..." or "any offspring taken, possessed, transported...". See that is the problem with this. Judges and legal professionals may interpret it slightly differently. I may be wrong. That's fair. I am not trying to hurt any feelings.

I also just noticed another problem with this issue. In order for legal action to take place, it needs to be proven that they are illegal. While not necessarily pertaining to galacts, in regards to the peacock tinc, how can you prove that a specific Tinctorius specimen is illegal? They are so variable and frankly many populations look similar. One of the theories with how Tumucumaque were smuggled out of Brazil in the first place is they were included in an import of Robertus. Robertus can look surprisingly similar to peacock tincs sometimes. And how would a non-scientific judge, with a complete lack of understanding of these species, say that these frogs weren't legally imported from a population that occurs in a country where it is legal to export from (i.e. Suriname)? Maybe that is why they won't touch this particular species.
Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.