Dendroboard - View Single Post - Silicone vs. Titebond background adhesion methods. My review.
Dendroboard

Go Back   Dendroboard
Register Blogs FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read Advertise

Support Our Sponsors
No Threads to Display.

facebook

View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2015, 05:07 PM
FrogTim's Avatar
FrogTim FrogTim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Posts: 820
Thanks: 19
Thanked 48 Times in 46 Posts
Default Re: Silicone vs. Titebond background adhesion methods. My review.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ulyssis View Post
I'm contemplating using some cork tiles on my next background. I stayed away from it because I like the 3D shape of the GS backgrounds. Cork tiles seem too flat and unnatural to me. Do you have pics of your tanks with the cork tiles?

I agree GS is more work and mess with the carving stage. But as you do more and more tanks, you get a good feel of how much GS to lay down. You can almost guess how much it will expand in the end. In the beginning tho, you usually put way to much. Carving more than 50% off. It is a waste of foam, but it's all part of learning.
I used Great Stuff on the cork tile. That way I got the best of both worlds. Lower footprint of the cork tile background plus the customization of great stuff. Plus carving/scraping GS outside of the vivarium on a moveable piece of cork tile is priceless.

Here's a 12x12x18 Cork tile background with 3 levels of great stuff, tree fern totem pieces and net pots. The foreground totem and net pot are just siliconed to the glass.




Here's a 24x18x24



Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.