
02-06-2012, 08:43 AM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,968
Thanks: 620
Thanked 82 Times in 67 Posts
|
|
Re: Ethics/Legality of Owning Tomato Frogs
Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilLost
I fully admit that I may be biased but I *HATE* pet stores with a passion. Corporations are legally obligated to care about nothing but profits....they don't care about humans and they damn sure don't care about animals...and the animal laws are a joke.
IMHO, if you have evidence of petsmart or any other major chain doing something illegal, I would take it directly to the cops/DA and not be "nice" about it. By letting them slide on it at your local store, it will not put any pressure on the company to change their policies. If its a small mom/pop store, different story...but I can't COUNT the number of petsmart/petcos I have walked through where I could easily spot all sorts of husbandry errors....
I can't comment on the "unannounced audits" but as a general rule, even with complaints, without evidence, they are pretty much free to practice..... the laws surrounding these (at the state+federal level) are a joke; lobbyists control them and its quite obvious (for example, certain humane treatment laws do not apply to lab mice and other lab animals...)
|
The "chain" that is selling these is "Pet Supplies Plus". I agree with you almost entirely. The part I disagree with is going straight to authorities. Perhaps the store manager struck a deal with someone not knowing the legality(or even having the insight to question it) of propogating this species? Maybe they were CB examples, and the seller was very good at misdirection? These are some examples of why I would approach them with a degree of humility. If the owner does not care/does not want to hear, then, perhaps, a call is in order...
JBear
__________________
P. bicolor-P. terribilis-R. sirensis-E. anthonyi-M. bernhardi
|