I am sick of the "people" trying to ban all of our Hobbies/Pets and Jobs.
Should People Be Allowed To Keep Exotic Animals As House Pets? | Fox News
Dangerous Animal Legislation; Ohio, SC, VA, PA, MO, OK & WI.
Occupational Hazard and Public Safety
There are two types of risk associated with livestock management - 1) Occupational risk and 2) public safety. These are completely separate issues. In the case of the Reptile Industry, occupational risk is the risk posed to those individuals who work with and around reptiles (not the innocent public). Public safety risk is that posed to the general public outside of the reptile keeper’s facility.
Unusually large specimens of the five largest snake species, venomous snakes and crocodilians do present a moderate occupational risk to their keepers. However, by any objective measure, the risk is no greater than that associated with other traditional livestock or pets. In recent years the Animal Rights (AR) Industry has waged an aggressive and sensational campaign to paint this occupational risk as an eminent threat to public safety. This is a false claim, confusing occupational hazard and public safety.
The AR Industry has lobbied in a number of States to pass legislation that would designate many reptiles as "Dangerous", seeking to ban private ownership. The reality is that there are many other types of livestock and pets that have been demonstrated, statistically and historically, to be much more dangerous to both keepers and to the public than any reptiles. However, no proposal has been made to label other animals, including dogs, horses, and other livestock, with the designation of "Dangerous", even though annually they each injure and kill far more people than do any reptile species.
This is an example of the prejudice felt by segments of the public against reptiles. Some people are frightened of reptiles. There is no doubt that reptiles, particularly snakes, carry the baggage of cultural bias, irrational fear and misunderstanding. This is in spite of the fact that only about one person a year is killed in this country by a captive reptile as an occupational hazard, compared to, say, the average 35 people a year that are killed by dogs. No members of the general public have been killed by reptiles, but there have been numerous cases involving dogs.
USARK rejects the designation of "Dangerous" to describe to any reptile. We understand that there are occupational risks involved in the captive husbandry of the largest examples of five large snake species, and venomous reptiles. It is the position of USARK that only experienced and serious keepers should work with these animals. However, it is important to consider that there is no evidence to suggest that these risks are any greater than those associated with working with other traditional types of livestock or pets - indeed, the measurable risk is significantly less. USARK has developed model legislation that can be enacted at the state level to ensure that keepers working with certain reptiles adhere to strict caging standards, safety protocols, escape prevention plans, registration and micro-chipping.
Studies done by the US Fish & Wildlife Service and US Geological Survey, suggest the rare fatality due to a captive reptile are occupational risk; and a NOT public safety risk. There is a moderate occupation risk taken when working with certain reptiles. Skill and care is required to handle them safely. It is an extremely rare event for a fatality to result. It is almost always the keeper or his employees or, more rarely, a third party within the keepers facility. However, there has never been any measurable risk to the general public. Best Management Practices further mitigate public risk by implementing standards and putting additional safeguards in place.
USARK OPPOSES- Legislation designating any reptiles as Dangerous; or the banning of private ownership and trade in any reptiles based on unsubstantiated and false claims of public safety risk.
1Likes
All the Animal Bans
Re: All the Animal Bans
Linear Mode
