Quote:
Originally Posted by markbudde
Can you clarify what you mean by breathing life into equations? I'm not quite sure I understand.
|
Hmm I have the concept but its difficult to phrase. I'll try... Um I guess it might be helpful to view energy and matter and as parts of a machine, actually perhaps we can just use the example of the PC...Why does your computer work? I mean on a fundamental level beyond the current laws of physics that only describe HOW it works. Why does energy/matter carry a charge and/or spin (this may not be fundamental enough), why does there need to be energy and matter, and by extension the PC...where did it come from, perhaps more importantly how did it get here. Why is there anything for the equations to describe? Why must it be those equations? Grrr I don't think most of that really touches the fundamental level I'm trying to get to. Why is there something rather then nothing, and how can there be one and the other, or can there only be one or the other.
Are there 2 places or is there only one (I mean the absolute must fundamental idea of "place" possible to conceive and then one step beyond)...actually what I mean by "fire" includes the something one step beyond the must fundamental ideas of place, existence and non existence, something, nothing, one, many, truth, being, non being...the list goes on and on. We are talking about what fundamentally makes the real...real, and the unreal unreal and the dynamic interplay between both, or that they are really one. I mean how do we resolve the paradox, what is the answer that contains all questions and the question that contains all answers. This is the end of logic and reason....and where the fire is found, but I have idea how to describe what it actually is beyond it being the truth of being, the Objective truth of being...and non being. Perhaps the Objective truth of paradox, or what seems to be paradox from our perpective.
By "fire" I mean that which is the question and the answer that contains all the who, what, where, when and why...and the complete perfect Objective truth and context of it all...and the meaning and the purpose.
So to answer your question, I'm not sure...did any of that rambling help you form some idea of what I may have meant? If so I'm afraid that may be the best any of us can do with words.
